Search for: "Companies A, B, and C"
Results 7181 - 7200
of 12,894
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2019, 9:04 am
C. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 7:58 am
Rodriquez, C. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 5:15 am
Offered changes included: (a) shareholders holding 1% of stock in a company could nominate board members; (b) board members must certify that they have no dealings with the company; (c) stockholders are permitted to vote on CEO pay; (d) shareholders with more than 10% of the stock should be granted a seat on the board; and (e) 10 year term limits for all board members. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 1:00 pm
Series C and Series B funding account for 35.87% and 8.93% of funding respectively. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 6:00 am
”4 Title V.5 Title VI.6 Title IX, Subtitle C.7 Title IX, Subtitle D.8 Title IX, Subtitle F.9 Title X.10 Title XIV. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 12:43 pm
Louis; Ronald B. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 5:15 am
§ 373.101 B. [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 4:45 pm
B. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 9:32 am
The directors also adopted a management incentive plan that compensated management for achieving a sale of the company. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:33 pm
Rule 21F-6(c) establishes a presumption of a statutory maximum award in cases where the award would be $5 million or less and where there are none of the negative award factors outlined in Rule 21F-6(b), such as culpability or unreasonable reporting delay. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 5:30 am
b. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 1:56 pm
C. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 3:26 am
Form F-7: Green Light for Canadian Companies From Paul Dudek of Latham & Watkins: On Friday, Corp Fin issued this no-action letter relating to MJDS Form F-7 rights offers by Canadian companies. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 12:43 pm
Louis; Ronald B. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
” Blizzard has been fighting companies like Bossland for years. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm
EB-1(B) outstanding researcher. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 2:25 pm
(b) The project identification number, if applicable. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 9:20 am
Under the new law, non-competes will only be enforceable if (a) the employer discloses the terms of the covenant in writing when making an offer or earlier; (b) the employee earns more than $100,000 a year; and (c) the non-compete is enforceable for a period not longer than 18 months. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 1:20 pm
§ 227(b)(1)(A)(iii). [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:39 pm
The IWC’s definition and one adopted by the Court in this case is: To “employ” means to (a) to exercise control over the wages, hours or working conditions, or (b) to suffer or permit to work, or (c) to engage, thereby creating a common law employment relationship. [read post]
