Search for: "Does 1-10"
Results 7181 - 7200
of 41,065
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2012, 1:28 pm
§ 9-10-91(1) [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:28 am
FowlerDocket: 10-1273Issue(s): Does the decision in Illinois v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 11:12 am
Our bill also imposes a 10% surtax on the value of an estate above $500 million ($1 billion for couples). [read post]
11 May 2013, 10:06 pm
Sharia does not require a majority vote. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm
Vasquez (possibly relisted after the 1/20 Conference) Docket: 10-8629 Issue(s): (1) Whether the prosecution violated Brady v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 8:33 pm
Does ANYBODY care about the homeowner who has no recourse? [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:18 pm
Here is my paper:AMENDMENTS TO THE MARRIAGE ACT 1961QUEENSLAND LAW SOCIETY LIVECAST Q &A14 FEBRUARY 2018Stephen Page[1]1. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 3:44 pm
But it does represent the continuation of our quite singular relations with this state. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 1:47 pm
The President said the $20 billion is not a cap and does not limit BP's liability, responsibility or legal challenges. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
This provision (as was mandated by Dodd-Frank) extends say on pay to all public companies (those registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, a requirement that applies to companies with 500 shareholders of record and $10 million in assets; see Rule 12g-1). [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:11 am
The Grand Chamber statements are underpinned not only by the way in which article 10(1) is worded, but by the consideration that the contrary view – that article 10(1) contains a prima facie duty of disclosure of all matters of public interest – leads to a proposition that no national regulation of such disclosure is required at all, before such a duty arises. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
Superior Ct., 51 Cal. 3d 807, 822 (Cal. 1990). 4 10 Cal. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 5:08 am
The statute relied upon by plaintiff does not compel a contrary finding, so McDonald’s did not violate § 1749.5(b)(1) by refusing to redeem plaintiff’s gift card for cash. [read post]
17 May 2011, 6:38 pm
HolderDocket: 10-577Issue(s): (1) Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding that petitioners’ convictions of filing, and aiding and abetting in filing, a false statement on a corporate tax return in violation of 26 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 3:02 pm
Between 10/1/09 and 10/01/10, Facebook sent nearly 8500 visitors to the Law School website (this does not include the number that it sent to the Faculty Blog [just over 350] or the Becker-Posner Blog [just over 4,000]). [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:01 pm
Thus the compositions according to the claims have endurance limits of between 250 and 2250 x 10**(4) reciprocations whereas the respective compositions employing MOCA achieve levels of only 10 to 90 x 10**(4). [3.3] Table 2 reports examples based on the same three polyurethane compositions as in Table 1 but in which only DMTDA curative is employed. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
ENDNOTES [1] See generally Holger Spamann, Indirect Investor Protection: The Investment Ecosystem and Its Legal Underpinnings, 14 J. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am
A lot has changed over that time, but the trade mark cases keep coming.Here’s another 10 highlights for your consideration.1. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 5:30 am
Questions arise only in relation to some of the 27 Participating Member States.[10] While most Participating Member States are Contracting States to the CISG, Ireland and Malta are not. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm
” So be it.[1.1] The first substantive communication of the ED dated 14 December 2005 and referred to in the impugned decision was based on claims 1-10 as originally filed. [1.1.1] The single independent claim 1 as originally filed reads: 1. [read post]
