Search for: "Fail v. State" Results 7181 - 7200 of 66,290
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2022, 8:06 am by CMS
The Heathrow case concerned the lawfulness of the Airports National Policy Statement (“ANPS”), particularly on whether the Secretary of State had failed to have proper regard to the Paris Agreement or to explain how the ANPS was compatible with the UK’s emissions targets. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 6:00 am by Lawrence J. Spiwak
Circuit’s 1973 ruling in National Petroleum Refiners Association v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 4:22 am by Emma Snell
“As in any situation where armed forces are used, everything will end with a treaty,” Lavrov said in an interview with state television. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 4:15 am by Eleonora Rosati
As a result, Poland’s action should fail and Article 17 be upheld.The judgment’s implicationsToday’s ruling will have a vast impact, both with regard to the application of already existing national transpositions of the DSM Directive and the transposition thereof by the remaining Member States (MS). [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Specifically, in the recent case of Worsoff v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 1:39 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The complaint alleges that in the Offering Documents and in statements during the class period, the defendants made false or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) the Company had defective financial controls; (ii) as a result, there were errors in the Company’s financial statements related to the misclassification of certain shares issued prior to the Business Combination; (iii) accordingly, the Company would need to restate certain of its financial… [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 1:03 pm by Susan C. Morse
The court explains that under its precedent, including United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Although the Board had contend that the statements at issue "are reasonably susceptible of defamatory connotations," the Appellate Division opined that the Board's complaint failed to "make a rigorous showing that the language of the [article] as a whole can be reasonably read both to impart a defamatory inference and to affirmatively suggest that the [Defendants] intended or endorsed that inference," citing Udell v NYP Holdings, Inc., 169 AD3d at… [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Although the Board had contend that the statements at issue "are reasonably susceptible of defamatory connotations," the Appellate Division opined that the Board's complaint failed to "make a rigorous showing that the language of the [article] as a whole can be reasonably read both to impart a defamatory inference and to affirmatively suggest that the [Defendants] intended or endorsed that inference," citing Udell v NYP Holdings, Inc., 169 AD3d at… [read post]