Search for: "High v State"
Results 7181 - 7200
of 35,518
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2006, 3:46 pm
The oral argument in Clark County Council v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm
This was certainly the stated view of Mrs Stocker after court. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 3:43 pm
Hinton and State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 4:20 am
For The Economist, Steven Mazie reports after Wednesday’s oral argument in Timbs v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 11:44 am
I assume that part of the reason is that these cases have an unusually high rate of going to trial -- rather than plea out -- due to the relatively high sentences and the fact that the defendants are often not your "usual" criminals who understand that a stint in the joint is the price you must occasionally pay for your profession. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 8:38 am
In particular, the Huawei v Conversant judgment has high similarity with Huawei v Samsung judgment rendered by the California Northern District Court. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 3:52 am
The High Court judged had therefore been correct to find that the decision was unreasonable in the public law sense of having been formed without taking relevant matters into account. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 9:09 am
It's a description of the power of the Guv under the state's constitution. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 1:19 pm
While LGBTQ workers in New York have long had protections against discrimination under local and state law, the high court has now extended federal protections to millions of workers nationwide. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 10:11 am
For all felony and high court misdemeanors in State of Michigan court proceedings, the Judge is required to consider the applicable sentence guidelines. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:30 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
The bar for bringing a claim has thus been raised, but clearly not, for now, as high as some commentators and practitioners have suggested. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
The bar for bringing a claim has thus been raised, but clearly not, for now, as high as some commentators and practitioners have suggested. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
The bar for bringing a claim has thus been raised, but clearly not, for now, as high as some commentators and practitioners have suggested. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:54 am
” The decision in Gelman v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 12:24 pm
In Wyeth v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 5:30 am
Leckler v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 1:01 am
Plessy v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 11:04 am
In Dorsey v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 5:57 pm
Court of Appeals in Cole v. [read post]
