Search for: "House v. House" Results 7181 - 7200 of 40,606
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2017, 12:43 pm
Marco said he did want another beer, and Lujano told him to come get it from his house. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 3:11 pm
If I pay someone to, say, garden my shrubs, and in return, they get to live in the guest house for free while doing so, yeah, totally, once I'm dead, the deal ends. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 1:18 pm
  The settlement deal says that the defendant will get out of the house by 3:00 p.m. on a given day, lest the stipulated judgment amount ($27,000) be filed, and it sounds like the defendant got out of the house at something like 3:15 p.m. that day. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 2:18 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Court held that the Court of Appeal should have considered the impact of the original capital payment on the wife’s current need to pay rent, and this involved a consideration of three earlier Court of Appeal authorities: Pearce v Pearce [2003] EWCA Civ 1054, North v North [2007] EWCA Civ 760, and Yates v Yates [2012] EWCA Civ 532. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 3:37 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers.
She continued to reside in the house with her mother, who died in 2007. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:35 pm by David
Trial Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/currentdct.htmCases featured:Washoe Housing Authority v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 9:01 am by Joe Consumer
There's been a lot of analysis of the disastrous impact of the Supreme Court's 5 to 4 Concepcion v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 9:01 am by Joe Consumer
There's been a lot of analysis of the disastrous impact of the Supreme Court's 5 to 4 Concepcion v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 12:11 pm by Giles Peaker
As per Lord Neuberger in Knowsley Housing Trust v White [2008] UKHL 70 “In my view, on a fair reading of section 85, it is open to the court to include a proleptic discharge provision in a suspended order for possession. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 11:31 am by Giles Peaker
That determination was clearly in accordance with the decision of the Tribunal in Nemcova v Fairfield Rents Limited (2016) UKUT 303 (LC). [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 11:08 am by Giles Peaker
The Court was referred to Re Southern Housing Group Limited (2011) L&TR 7 (our note) and The Anchor Trust v Waby [2018] UKUT 370 (LC), both decisions on when a charge could be considered as fixed. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 11:33 am by Giles Peaker
Housing benefit was terminated in September 2011 and a Notice to Quit served in October 2011. [read post]