Search for: "House v. State" Results 7181 - 7200 of 25,124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2014, 4:37 am by Amy Howe
At Talking Points Memo, Sahil Kapur examines the extent to which the lower courts have relied on last year’s decision in United States v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 3:37 pm by Beth Graham
  The bill was purportedly filed in response to the holding in Broom v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:31 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
The trooper has said so publicly many times.None of that sounded too convincing, frankly, which I suppose is why the bill passed out of committee two years ago by a 7-1 margin, dying on the General State Calendar on the final day awaiting a House floor vote. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 10:02 am by Benton Martin, E.D. Mich.
Last month, the Sixth Circuit issued an important Fourth Amendment decision regarding searches of electronic devices, United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm by John Elwood
Much of D.C. may be suffering from the partisan gridlock gripping the White House and Congress, but the Least Dysfunctional Branch is back, rested, and ready to get to work. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:48 am by Meg Martin
Fuller and his wife leased a house and garage in Casper. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 10:00 pm
" (source: Congressional Daily) District Court Clarifies How PTO Should Compute Patent Terms Wyeth v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
” In its place, the Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity published a final rule limiting federal oversight of local housing programs. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:26 pm
Further to this morning's earlier posts (see immediately below), the IPKat can now say a bit about the approach taken by the House of Lords to the proper test of inventive step in Conor Medsystems Inc v Angiotech Pharmaceuticals Inc. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 6:38 pm by Gene Takagi
The interests asserted by petitioners cannot be accommodated with that compelling governmental interest, see United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 4:56 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The dust-up in Delaware over fee-shifting bylaws got started in May 2014, when the Delaware Supreme Court in the ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]