Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF T W" Results 7181 - 7200 of 8,738
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2010, 9:56 am
Parker finished his shift on the date of the accident, but thereafter was out of work until he returned to light duty on September 1, 2009.The then Mayor, Harry Lewis, issued an initial letter determination denying Parker's application for GML §207-c benefits stating, in pertinent part, that "[t]he claimed injury and/or disability did not occur as the result of the performance of your duties. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:55 am
" To his acute embarrassment the Kat confesses he hasn't ever heard of this Secretariat, which seems to have an involvement in matters relating to ACTA. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 3:38 pm by CMLP Staff
As Justice Schmidt writes in his dissent, Justice Holdridge's conclusion "misses the point" because "[t]he protection of the anonymity of speech is a separate issue from the defamatory nature of the speech." [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 3:38 pm by CMLP Staff
And to the extent these procedural safeguards increase the burden on a would-be plaintiff as a practical matter, this burden is justified—if at all—by the irrevocability of the decision to unmask the speaker, not by a desire to protect anonymous defamers. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 1:53 pm by Sheppard Mullin
In January 2007, the Court denied FMC’s facial challenge to its subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 1:37 pm by Bexis
  We’re happy to report that most of the time they haven’t been successful in avoiding Michigan law.They came closest in Rowe v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 7:24 am by John Inazu
Janet notes "[t]here's a huge trust between us" and "[w]e'll tell each other everything. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 5:12 am by Kelly
For tax years beginning after December 31, 2010 (the fancy way of saying the 2011 tax year), employers will be required to report health care benefits on a form W-2. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 4:31 pm
Claim construction isn't the place for giving a mulligan to a defective claim. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 11:06 am
Something the opinion doesn't mention, but that's easy to figure out. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:01 pm
According to this New York Times news article, the speaker was Gerald W. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 1:09 pm
(CAFC 2009-1487) precedential You don't see this often in precedential rulings: "per curium. [read post]