Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 7181 - 7200
of 18,112
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2017, 10:18 am
Related Cases: Microsoft v. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 4:00 am
SOQUIJ is attached to the Québec Department of Justice and collects, analyzes, enriches, and disseminates legal information in Québec. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 8:46 am
For that, I read a really terrific book by Peter Strauss Administrative Justice in the United States. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 6:10 am
Horton, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 5:23 am
Copyright © 2007-2017 Simple Justice NY, LLC This feed is for personal, non-commercial and Newstex use only. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:11 pm
Relying on the Court of Justice’s decisions in Google Spain v APED and Gonzalez C‑131/12 and Weltimmo v Nemzeti Adatvedelmi C‑230/14, the court held that Facebook Ireland is a data controller for the purposes of section 5 of the DPA and can therefore be liable under this Act. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 8:08 am
Lee v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 3:50 pm
For example, the Court of Appeal holds that choice of law rulings are always subject to reconsideration (even without new facts or law) because they're just essentially preliminary in limine decisions. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 2:06 pm
Gershengorn argues before a six justice bench in Ziglar v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 10:54 am
by Dennis Crouch USPTO v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 7:58 am
"Usually if you amend an opinion to distinguish a case or two, you say more than just that you find them inapt, without explaining why they're so-not-apt.But apparently Justice Ikola thinks that simply calling them inapt is sufficient here. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 7:28 am
In the case of R v Golds [2016] UKSC 61, the Supreme Justices were tasked with determining what amounted to a “substantial” mental impairment in the context of the defence of diminished responsibility. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 6:12 am
Tuesday morning’s argument in Midland Funding v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 4:00 am
Au Canada, l’évolution récente du contrôle judiciaire a été marquée par une déférence variable, l’application de critères déroutants et la qualification nouvelle de vieux problèmes, sans qu’une solution n’offre de véritables repères aux parties, à leurs avocats, aux décideurs administratifs ou aux cours de justice saisies de demandes de… [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 6:34 pm
The presumption of diminished responsibility of youth in murder sentencing under Canadian law and the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA): the case of R. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 5:16 am
Dec. 28, 2015); Sikhs for Justice “SFJ,” Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 8:00 am
Trump has also repeatedly vowed to appoint Supreme Court justices who will overturn Roe v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 4:09 am
The defendants argue that these contentions are misconceived because the Court of Appeal correctly concluded that A v BBC did not alter the applicable principles – which are derived from Re S [2004] UKHL 47, [2005] 1 AC 593 and Re Guardian News and Media [2010] UKSC 1, [2010] 2 AC 697. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:17 pm
The Right to a Good (Business) Reputation and Truth: Re-Examining the Declaration of Falsity, Gary K. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 9:55 am
Supreme Court in Hurst v. [read post]
