Search for: "Matter of Mark T." Results 7181 - 7200 of 16,585
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2016, 7:03 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
Second, their actions would interfere with what Mark Lemley has called the "channelling" function of trade secret law. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 12:58 pm by David Post
To a company such as Louis Vuitton, it almost doesn’t matter if its litigation of particular cases like this one is unsuccessful, because the chilling effect remains. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:25 am by kgates
One of the “key issues” in the case therefore became “whether the defendants developed their FLASHXHYPE mark independently or, instead, sought to trade on the plaintiffs’ reputation after learning of their use of the SLAMXHYPE mark. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 10:17 am by David M. Ward
So Mark Zuckerberg wears the same t-shirts and hoodies every day. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 8:00 am by Gregory J. Brod
  Still, when asked about the bus line’s safety record, the President of the Greyhound drivers’ union focused on fatigue saying: “So, you can teach people how to make a right turn, a left turn, and keep eyes open and watch the mirrors, but the bottom line is if you create a work environment that’s hostile to rest, which is what we have in the whole industry, then it doesn’t matter. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 5:43 am
As Sven Klos remarked, having litigated the same provision of Benelux trade mark law (where the "substantial value" exclusion originates from) for 20 years, he still does not know what it is supposed to mean (and the CJEU's Hauck decision hasn't made this easier, has it). [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 3:39 am
An augmented panel sustained an opposition to registration of the mark THE HOUSE THAT JUICE BUILT for T-shirts, baseball caps, hats, jackets and sweatshirts, the mark “THE HOUSE THAT JUICE BUILT” (with quotation marks) for mugs, and the design mark shown below for “T-shirts, baseball caps, hats, jackets and sweatshirts,” finding the first two marks likely to cause dilution-by-blurring of the Yankees’… [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 12:50 pm by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Recently, the Tennessee Court of Appeals analyzed the meaning of this language change, marking the first time a state court has interpreted the new terms. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 10:45 am by Ron Coleman
  They compete with the superhero brands that matter, i.e., the characters and all … that. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 5:02 am by Kristen Wolf
  Photo Credit: Mark Ralston/AFP/Getty Images via NPR.org   The post NPR: Is It Fair To Have To Pay Fees To A Union You Don’t Agree With? [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 3:00 am by SHG
They appear to believe that all offenders, no matter how minor their misbehavior, are on the path to robbery and murder. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
And by ignoring them, she is able to address matters that labor historians have neglected. [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
What is so crucial about a classification of these matters and debates as "constitutional," if not an effect of channeling them as pursuits of constitutional law for courts of law to attend to? [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm by Daniel Hemel
The administration’s overall probability of success (P) is equal to: pt + (1 - pt)(ps x pp) The administration may think that pt is so close to 1 that the rest of the terms in the equation don’t matter. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm by Daniel Hemel
The administration’s overall probability of success (P) is equal to: pt + (1 - pt)(ps x pp) The administration may think that pt is so close to 1 that the rest of the terms in the equation don’t matter. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm by Daniel Hemel
The administration’s overall probability of success (P) is equal to: pt + (1 - pt)(ps x pp) The administration may think that pt is so close to 1 that the rest of the terms in the equation don’t matter. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 1:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
The university then changed its Guidelines to clarify that ISU marks could not be used to suggest promotion of certain items, including illegal drugs, and to state under Section 3d that ISU’s name and marks could not be used to imply support or endorsement of a particular position on matters of public concern. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 10:00 am by Guest Blogger
  In these respects, they were marked by a time of high and widely shared growth. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 9:42 am by Florian Mueller
Even when many pundits predict certiorari, it often doesn't materialize (case in point: Oracle v. [read post]