Search for: "People v. Downs"
Results 7181 - 7200
of 16,918
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
The rule of three was ruled valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 12:18 pm
In 2011, he vetoed SB 914, a bill that would have overruled People v. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 1:54 pm
In 2019, EFF intervened in a court case called Uniloc v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
This decision prompted establishment of the so-called "rule of three," currently set out in Section 61.1 of the Civil Service Law and held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 7:12 am
Far from seeking to crack down with force on non-violent resistance in east-central Europe, Gorbachev tolerated and indeed actively encouraged sweeping political change in the region. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 11:07 am
And so the Supreme Court said that while it's not OK to kill the insane, it's perfectly fine to kill crazy people as long as they aren't insane in a particular way.The Court decided Ford v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Young v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 8:21 am
” In Clapper v. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 6:19 am
Considering the effort that must have gone into the EU's five-page request, there's likely more to come though.The Commission can accept China's invitation, sit down, and talk. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 12:00 am
This decision prompted establishment of the so-called "rule of three," currently set out in Section 61.1 of the Civil Service Law and held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
The rule of three was ruled valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 1:31 am
This text may seem a little puzzling to people who don't walk the streets of London, but there was some rhyme and reason: it was in response to a very striking advertisement by gay rights campaign organisation Stonewall, which read: "SOME PEOPLE ARE GAY, GET OVER IT!" [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 10:35 am
Those are the kinds of people that industry players concerned about Federal Circuit-style pro-patentee bias should talk to. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 1:15 pm
Brackeen v. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 12:27 am
In an issue of national interest, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Fisher v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 12:00 pm
Officer Henry then patted Cooks down for weapons. [read post]
3 May 2021, 4:00 am
But he did not close down super spreader workplaces, or legislate paid sick leave, or speed up vaccinations – no that all would make too much sense. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 9:37 am
In June 2012, as I wound down my clerkship, the Supreme Court decided NFIB v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:46 pm
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 12:51 pm
Terry v. [read post]
