Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 7181 - 7200
of 13,843
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2014, 8:39 am
The California Supreme Court recently announced its decision in Duran v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
The California Supreme Court held in Ingersoll v. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 5:53 pm
The United States Supreme Court has the final word with regard to the interpretation of the United States Constitution, including the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
Superior Court was invalidated by the United States Supreme Court’s 2011 decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 12:32 pm
Two weeks after the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its opinion in Alice v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 10:34 am
The case is Mayfair House Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:28 am
In United States Civil Service Commission v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 9:00 pm
Just recently, in Riley v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:40 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 11:49 am
Except for any disputes relating to intellectual property rights, obligations, or any infringement claims, any disputes with 23andMe arising out of or relating to the Agreement (“Disputes”) shall be governed by California law regardless of your country of origin or where you access 23andMe, and notwithstanding of any conflicts of law principles and the United Nations Convention for the International Sale of Goods. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 5:08 am
United States, 333 U. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
ConsiderUnited States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 10:50 am
A while back, I started following a cert petition in Williams v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 8:18 am
United States, and Morris v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:00 am
The landscape changed drastically in 2010 when the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
California together with United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:13 pm
Wong and United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:35 pm
Here’s the best line in the Riley opinion: The United States asserts that a search of all data stored on a cell phone is “materially indistinguishable” from searches of these sorts of physical items… . [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:35 pm
Here’s the best line in the Riley opinion: The United States asserts that a search of all data stored on a cell phone is “materially indistinguishable” from searches of these sorts of physical items… . [read post]
