Search for: "State v. Congress"
Results 7181 - 7200
of 29,295
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2020, 6:33 am
In Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 12:01 am
The Supreme Court decision Scott v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
But query whether in the federalism context, where other plain-statement rules such as that announced in 1991 in Gregory v Ashcroft (which requires Congress to clearly say in the text of a regulatory statute that the statute applies to state and local government entities before states can be required to obey) seem designed to make sure Congress has carefully considered state interests, Congress itself has to be the one to fix any… [read post]
Summary: Appointment of USCIS Director Cuccinelli Violates Federal Vacancies Reform Act, Court Rules
3 Mar 2020, 2:00 pm
-M. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 1:59 pm
” Alito says, in reference to a statute that President Barack Obama’s administration declined to defend in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 11:11 am
V, 132 Stat. 1213-25. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 11:11 am
V, 132 Stat. 1213-25. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 11:07 am
With the passage of the “False Claims Amendments of 1986,” [5] the Attorney General of the United States was given the authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands in connection with the investigation of civil False Claims Act matters. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 11:07 am
Among other things, Clement emphasized, the Constitution would prevent Congress from imposing more restrictive removal provisions for some parts of the president’s cabinet, such as the Departments of State and Defense. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
In East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 3:52 am
Just eight months later, in Abrams v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 3:40 am
For The New York Times, Adam Liptak and Abby Goodnough report that “[t]he case was brought by Republican state officials, who argued that when Congress eliminated the law’s requirement in 2017 that most Americans obtain health insurance, the law became unconstitutional[; t]he Trump administration sided with the state officials, arguing that the rest of the health care law could not survive without the requirement. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 11:00 pm
In Alden v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 7:30 pm
In its controversial 2012 ruling in NFIB v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:04 pm
" United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 5:52 pm
Nidal Khalid Nasrallah seeks the United States’ protection under the Convention Against Torture. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:46 am
Sebelius, holding that the mandate is a valid exercise of Congress’ taxing power. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:14 am
Surveys, testimony, observing online behavior are all different sources of empirical evidence: searches originating on Amazon v. searches originating on Google. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 8:22 am
Fish and Wildlife Service v. [read post]
