Search for: "State v. Settle"
Results 7181 - 7200
of 15,593
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2015, 11:13 am
The case is Paolucci v. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 7:30 am
With respect to Petitioners' claims involving the Freedom of Information Law [FOIL], the Commissioner held that such claims must dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, explaining that §89 of the Public Officers Law "vests exclusive jurisdiction over alleged FOIL violations in the Supreme Court of the State of New York. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:53 am
It also proves that differences can be settled in a spirit of good will and good faith. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 2:31 pm
Flick After nine months of rumors and uncertainty as to where the FCC is headed after last summer's indecency decision by the Supreme Court in FCC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:24 am
In the case of Baigis v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 6:53 am
In Smallwood v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 6:56 am
Doe by through Doe v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 2:06 pm
In some cases, settling this issue fairly without legal intervention is impossible. [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 6:49 pm
A recent case from the Massachusetts Appeals Court makes agreement on this issue much more difficult.In the case of Lapat v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm
Ag Supply v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 12:33 pm
United States may help settle that debate.LDA imports rigid steel conduit from China. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 6:24 am
Unless the case settles. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 1:45 pm
In fact, the Fort Worth Court of Appeals in Clanin v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:44 am
"The case is Salazar-Limon v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 9:11 am
NYCLU gets the reports.The case is United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 7:01 am
In Donawa v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 8:49 am
The court also declined to entertain related control person liability claims, never reached other CEA merits claims, and dismissed a state law unjust enrichment claim (Choi v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
Corp. v New York State Dept. of Labor, 80 AD3d 924 and other court rulings, the Appellate Division observed that it is well settled that "a petitioner is not aggrieved by an administrative determination made on its default and may not seek to review such a determination. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:22 am
SORAN, II, DAN SORAN, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE: DAN SORAN, LYNETTE SORAN and SARAH SORAN v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
The case is U.S. v. [read post]