Search for: "v. "
Results 7181 - 7200
of 493,833
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2024, 7:27 pm
If you have substantial cash with you when arrested for alleged drug trafficking, that substantial cash may be used as evidence that you were trafficking and not simply using, and may be seized in asset forfeiture proceedings (and the Supreme Court in Culley v. [read post]
18 May 2024, 2:48 pm
The basis for this decision is explained in Cyber Power Systems (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2024, 1:38 pm
In Calixte v. [read post]
18 May 2024, 9:56 am
“AI Meets ‘Brown v. [read post]
18 May 2024, 9:01 am
Boulos v. [read post]
18 May 2024, 7:41 am
Mular v. [read post]
18 May 2024, 6:53 am
The opinion is styled, Johnetta Askew Hunt v. [read post]
18 May 2024, 6:30 am
In Icahn Partners v. deSouza, the Court of Chancery, in a letter opinion (Jan. 16, 2024), ruled that the Icahn-Affiliated Director was not entitled to share the information with the Icahn Funds. [read post]
18 May 2024, 6:30 am
In Icahn Partners v. deSouza, the Court of Chancery, in a letter opinion (Jan. 16, 2024), ruled that the Icahn-Affiliated Director was not entitled to share the information with the Icahn Funds. [read post]
18 May 2024, 4:00 am
President Abraham Lincoln5/18/1896: Plessy v. [read post]
18 May 2024, 1:52 am
Jane LambertPatents Court (HH Judge Hacon) Safestand Ltd v Weston Homes PLC and others [2023] EWHC 3250 (Pat) (19 Dec 2023)This was a claim by Safestand Limited ("Safestand") against Weston Homes Plc, Weston (Logistics) Limited. and Weston Group Limited ("the Weston companies" or "Weston") for patent and registered design infringement. [read post]
18 May 2024, 12:42 am
Supreme Court decided Evenwel v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:37 pm
Cir. 1997) and Epcon Gas Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Schweber and Anderson explain that under the test established in Brandenburg v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:06 pm
I have some further thoughts on the CFPB v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 5:49 pm
In the case of Mikyas and Others v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:54 pm
In Swiech v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:50 pm
“Law Professor’s Tireless Search for Rare Recordings Resurrects Voices of Landmark Segregation Case; Using AI and sleuthing, a team recreated unrecorded oral arguments from Brown v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:47 pm
The court determined that: i) The state has a duty to inform the owners that it intends to acquire their property—a right to notice; ii) The state’s obligation to consider objections—the right to hear; iii) The state has a duty to inform its acquisition decision, ensuring the right to a reasoned decision; iv) The state has a duty to demonstrate that the acquisition is for a public cause—acquisitions should only be made for public purposes; v) The state’s duty… [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:29 pm
BrazilBig Pan Bakery v. [read post]