Search for: "BES v. State"
Results 7201 - 7220
of 68,870
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2006, 6:29 am
Defense attorneys argued on appeal that the domestic violence law was in part unconstitutional because it defines a "family or household member" as being a "person living as a spouse" in violation of the marriage validity amendment. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 6:00 am
(See Kraus v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 2:24 pm
Smith v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 9:34 am
However, in Reginelli v. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 9:12 am
In criminal prosecutions in Florida, the state has to establish a "chain of custody" for certain kinds of evidence in order for it to be admitted. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 4:41 am
BNA's United States Law Week reported in Vol. 75, No. 22 (Dec. 12, 2006) on the case Nagrampa v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 11:10 am
That last case — Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 2:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:43 am
See, e.g., Wiggins v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:40 am
The decision carries the name Kentucky v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:20 am
While the attempts of libel defendants to fight off claims by justifying what they have said often result in the claimant being put through the wringer at trial (the situation in the recent case of Cairns v Modi [2012] EWHC 756 (QB)), the defence here is at the extreme end of the spectrum: the meaning which the Defendant seeks to prove is that the Claimant, who does not currently stand convicted of any offence, is probably a murderer. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
Says the inescapable inference to be drawn is to prevent Parliament from being able to disagree with the Prime Minister. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:18 am
” He stated that the value of intelligence can only be judged in hindsight. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 7:02 am
MA & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2016] UKSC 58R (on the application of Carmichael and Rourke) (formerly known as MA and others) (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Respondent) R (on the application of Daly and others) (formerly known as MA and others) (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Respondent) R (on the application of A)… [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 9:09 am
The written order stated that a family offense petition had been filed in the case, listed the date of the petition and noted that the order was being issued after a hearing at which respondent had been present. [read post]
Dangerous Decision in Oracle v. Google: Federal Circuit Reverses Sensible Lower Court Ruling on APIs
9 May 2014, 12:25 pm
We're still digesting today's lengthy decision in the Oracle v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
In SEC v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:29 am
These days, the answer is No.The case is McKithen v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 6:20 am
State v. [read post]
