Search for: "Browning v. Browning" Results 7201 - 7220 of 12,667
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2011, 5:29 pm by Anders Walker
  Just came across a letter by Ralph Ellison responding to William Faulkner's defense of a moderate, gradualist approach to Brown v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:46 am
  Only video games rated "EC," or "early childhood", would be exempt from the labeling requirement.It is possible that this requirement of near-universal labeling is an attempt to avoid the recent Supreme Court decision in Brown v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Terry Hart
” Fourth Circuit overturns massive jury verdict in copyright case against internet service provider — Attorney Evan Brown looks at this week’s Fourth Circuit decision in Sony Music Entertainment v. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 11:00 pm
Brown, the SIEU agreed to remove this measure from November's ballot. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:17 pm by Ezra Rosser
This Article draws a through-line between laws enacted to prevent desegregation in the aftermath of the Brown v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 11:49 am
Appointing a former politician to the court would almost certainly introduce a more populist element: the Supreme Court that in 1954 decided Brown v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:40 am by Walter Olson
Todd Brown, Buffalo, SSRN] Could Gene McCarthy’s candidacy have survived Arizona elections law? [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 3:46 am by Timothy P. Flynn
   Brown v Entertainment Merchants Association is a 7-2 decision invalidating California's ban of violent video game sales to minors on the grounds that such regulation is an unconstitutional restriction on protected free speech.So now, when California's pre-teens are committing untold violent capital felonies in Grand Theft Auto, at least they will not be breaking the law in the real world.Under the First Amendment, SCOTUS held… [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 7:57 am by Kevin Schad appellate division SDOH
Today, the Court issued a very helpful opinion in the case of Ayers v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 6:04 am
When Congress changed this law, it left the military sodomy statute (Article 125 of the UCMJ) intact despite many calls for change in the wake of the Supreme Court's holding in Lawrence v. [read post]