Search for: "English v. English"
Results 7201 - 7220
of 11,204
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2009, 7:50 am
A recent decision by the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, Reyes v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:29 am
Conclusion: Employers should use plain English, precise language to describe their non-compete restrictions, and employees should not sign an agreement unless they understand what restraints they are agreeing to, as these agreements are enforceable in Texas, when written correctly. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 6:13 am
In the recent case of Content Services Ltd v Bundesarbeitskammer (C? [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 1:32 am
Choice of Law in Intellectual Property Part IV Interregional Conflicts and Cooperation 13 Interregional Conflicts and Cooperation between Mainland, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan Part V Final Remarks 14. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:30 am
., Serial No. 78689888 [Section 2(d) refusal to register mark PROFILE for "motorcycle helmets and auto racing helmets sold by motorcycle or auto racing retailers" in view of the identical mark registered for "helmets for the sports of hockey and ringette"].May 12, 2009 - 2 PM: In re AAMCO Transmissions, Inc, Serial No. 78965665 [Appeal from requirement that Applicant disclaim the phrase "COMPLETE CAR CARE EXPERTS" in the mark AAMCO COMPLETE CAR EXPERTS & Design… [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 9:00 am
In Schenck v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 3:00 am
Jones denied the International Franchise Association’s (IFA) motion for preliminary injunction in the IFA v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
See United Kingdom v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:00 am
To review the Court’s opinion, see Trump v. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 11:44 am
Well, their courts invalidated the sodomy law years prior to Lawrence v. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 3:21 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada cited the 3rd edition in its decision in Buschau v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:00 am
Of the new forms, following the decision in Granovsky Estate v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 7:00 pm
The Court of Appeal emphasised earlier this week in R v Dobson that “compelling evidence” does not mean that the evidence must be irresistible, or that absolute proof of guilt is required. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:44 am
" http://j.mp/atz0v7 a conversation between david brooks and gail collins on "Old Media v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 3:00 pm
I remember it formed part of our rather painful and protracted analysis of the methods, means and history of piercing the corporate veil under English law. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 3:30 am
A few months ago, the Supreme Court decided Bostock v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 5:45 am
In Gilmer v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:01 am
The French Republic v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 3:00 am
., v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 8:00 am
I'm sure we'll return to this subject of the difference between meanings and intentions, perhaps to discuss Berg v. [read post]
