Search for: "In re R. F." Results 7201 - 7220 of 10,010
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2011, 12:05 pm
Kagenveama (In re Kagenveama), 541 F.3d 868, 875-77 (9th Cir. 2008); Musselman v. eCast Settlement Corp., 394 B.R. 801, 814 (E.D.N.C. 2008); In re Green, 378 B.R. 30, 38 (Bankr. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 7:12 am
 If you sort by the subject line of messages, messages with "re:" or "fw:" are sorted by R or F, respectively, not the real subject line. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 3:07 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) L & R v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 649 (23 March 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Bayfine UK v HM Revenue and Customs [2011] EWCA Civ 304 (23 March 2011) Baturina v Times Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 308 (23 March 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) National Westminster Bank Plc v Binney [2011] EWHC 694 (QB) (23 March 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) The Hedgehog Golf Company Ltd v Hauser [2011] EWHC 689 (Ch) (23 March… [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:03 am by John Day
 See Black,582 F.3d at 745-46, citing Semien, 436 F.3d at 812. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:39 pm by Marty Schwimmer
  In re Realistic Co., 440 F.2d 1393 (C.C.P.A. 1971) (finding CURV not merely descriptive of permanent wave curling solution); In re Waldorf Paper Prods. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
Capital Cities/ABC, Inc., 255 F.3d 1180 (9th Cir. 2001), is anything more than a variation on defamation jurisprudence. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 12:36 pm by David Lat
You’re a professional; your drug of choice should be as white as your starched dress shirt’s collar. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 2:40 pm
Among the items so covered are certain wage replacement payments as specified at Code Sec. 6334(f). [read post]