Search for: "MATTER OF C A"
Results 7201 - 7220
of 36,786
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2020, 11:00 am
The circuit court considered the plain language of Rule 23(c)(1)(C), “which allows for multiple bites at the apple throughout the litigation, and … does not impose an additional requirement on parties to prove a change in law or show new evidence to succeed on a renewed motion for certification. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 11:00 am
The circuit court considered the plain language of Rule 23(c)(1)(C), “which allows for multiple bites at the apple throughout the litigation, and … does not impose an additional requirement on parties to prove a change in law or show new evidence to succeed on a renewed motion for certification. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 11:00 am
The circuit court considered the plain language of Rule 23(c)(1)(C), “which allows for multiple bites at the apple throughout the litigation, and … does not impose an additional requirement on parties to prove a change in law or show new evidence to succeed on a renewed motion for certification. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 11:00 am
Eligible Subject Matter The subject matter requirement for this pilot program is the same as that for the COVID-19 Prioritized Examination Pilot Program (C-19 PEPP). [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 9:45 am
(C) If the immunity described in division (A) of this section does not apply, no class action shall be brought against any person alleging liability for damages for injury, death, or loss to person or property on a cause of action specified in that division. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 7:34 am
Plaintiff asserts a plausible case in claiming that the jail did not properly treat his Hepatitis C, detailing how his liver would deteriorate even further without proper treatment. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 5:30 am
Fong] matter, as conceded by the defendants. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Matter of Fishman, 22 A.D.3d 100, 2005 NYSlipOp 06802 Matter of Calonge v Calonge, 52 AD3d 1111, 2008 NYSlipOp 05630; Matter of Marino, 73 A.D.3d 5, 2010 NYSlipOp 01800; Matter of McKenzie, 177 AD3d 134, 2019 NYSlipOp 06729; People v Jenkins, 55 Misc 3d 1207(A), 2017 NYSlipOp 50449(U); and People v Williams, 20 AD3d 72, 2005 NYSlipOp 04317. ** Respondent stipulated that [1] he stands convicted of a… [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Matter of Fishman, 22 A.D.3d 100, 2005 NYSlipOp 06802 Matter of Calonge v Calonge, 52 AD3d 1111, 2008 NYSlipOp 05630; Matter of Marino, 73 A.D.3d 5, 2010 NYSlipOp 01800; Matter of McKenzie, 177 AD3d 134, 2019 NYSlipOp 06729; People v Jenkins, 55 Misc 3d 1207(A), 2017 NYSlipOp 50449(U); and People v Williams, 20 AD3d 72, 2005 NYSlipOp 04317. ** Respondent stipulated that [1] he stands convicted of a… [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
” So Herrmann talks about the transitioning and advancement of the C-Suite, post 2008. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:48 pm
" Also: Some of the ["Black MBA Candidates c/o 2022"] email's factual claims are dubious. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 5:29 am
Jessica C. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 3:09 am
The Amendments provide that a “knowledgeable employee” (as defined in Rule 3c-5(a)(4) of the Investment Company Act of 1940) of a 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) fund will now be considered an accredited investor. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 3:06 am
Following IEEE’s purported “clarification” and “update” of its Patent Policy in 2015, with a non-objecting Business Review Letter from the U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Even many of those who have the financial means to pay cannot, as a practical matter, have their voting rights restored, because the state and local records rarely make clear exactly how much an ex-felon owes in LFOs and to whom. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 12:35 pm
(c) Cases involving alleged squatters, illegal occupiers or persons unknown. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 10:21 am
Commentators blame/credit unions for the exemption’s demise, but the source hardly matters. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 10:16 am
., the writ of mandamus may be issued only if (a) there is no adequate alternative means of relief for the petitioner, (b) the right to the writ is “clear and indisputable” and (c) issuing the writ is appropriate. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 6:50 am
So, as Rule 4(f)(1) FRCP does not provide the final answer, the plaintiff needs to look at Rule 4(f)(2)(C)(ii) FRCP, which expressly authorizes the use of any form of mail that requires a signed receipt. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 1:55 am
It’s just a matter of standing up one more time than you’re knocked down.U.S. immigration law is now tighter than ever. [read post]
