Search for: "Masse v. Masse"
Results 7201 - 7220
of 10,246
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2011, 11:39 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:17 am
Co. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 6:12 pm
The same can apply for color trade marks and trade dress in the U.S. as long as the color has acquired a "secondary meaning" and is non-functional, i.e. the color does not function except as an indication as to source (Qualitex v Jacobson) Ask any shopper on Fifth Avenue and the AmeriKat thinks one could quickly come to the conclusion that the primary function of the red-sole is that of indicating the source of the shoe as being Louboutin - that or signalling to the poor… [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 7:30 am
Starkweather, 2011 Mass. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 8:24 pm
Mass. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 8:40 am
As for the future of the Wal-Mart v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 6:10 am
In the wake of the wailing and moaning over AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 12:53 pm
The appeal, known as ETK v NGN Ltd , was listed in private. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 12:06 pm
In Marhefka v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:05 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Pacific Century International Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
Forgive me for using a V for Vendetta quote here, but you cannot kill an idea. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 6:47 am
SB9 would not have existed without Roper v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 12:47 pm
Pidge, 400 Mass. 350, 353 (1987); Commonwealth v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 12:20 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The case is this morning’s United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 3:59 pm
In California Grocers Association v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:46 am
MANN v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:46 am
MANN v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 3:30 am
From the HBO synopsis: “‘Mann v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:15 am
" Brandenburg v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 5:57 am
Centech v. [read post]
