Search for: "S. et al"
Results 7201 - 7220
of 29,084
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2009, 12:44 am
Undoubtedly, other agencies around the world should draw inspiration from the FTC practice (above is Aghion's et al. inverted U curve). [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 12:58 pm
” These two recent decisions, Garling, et al., v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 12:21 pm
That's what makes me a living constitutionalist like your co-blogger Jack. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 11:14 am
KAREN DAVIS, ET AL. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 12:50 pm
Chubb Custom Insurance Co. et al., the Iowa Supreme Court affirmed the district court’s ruling that Farm Bureau was not entitled to liability coverage in its disputes with two applicants that were HIV positive. [read post]
15 Oct 2006, 7:39 am
Gonzalez-Velez et. al., Nos. 05-1184, 05-1758 (10/13/06). [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 8:30 am
.: Jackie Abbott et al. v Banner Health Network et al., CV-15-0013-PR (issue regards a patient class-action against Arizona hospitals in which patients claim hospitals engaged in “balance billing” in liens, precluded by federal law) The Supreme Court oral arguments will be live-streamed/simulcast and archived for later viewing here. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 12:30 pm
Bolotin, et al., ___ Cal.App.4th ___(March 27, 2009, No KC047712) By Jon E. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, Ltd, et al., Dkt. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 11:27 am
., et al., Slip Op. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 11:57 pm
BILL McCOLLUM, ET AL. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:49 am
Immersion again protested NetImpact’s award before GAO in Immersion Consulting, LLC, B-415155.4 et al. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 11:19 am
Johnson, et al., No. 07-cv-40065 (Sup. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 3:49 pm
Peterman et al., ruling that California’s feed-in tariff for small qualifying facilities (QFs), the Renewable Market Adjusting Tariff (ReMAT), violates the federal Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) (Ninth Circuit Case No. 17-17531). [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:14 am
Morrison, et al., No. 456 Mass. 463 (2010). [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 3:49 pm
Peterman et al., ruling that California’s feed-in tariff for small qualifying facilities (QFs), the Renewable Market Adjusting Tariff (ReMAT), violates the federal Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) (Ninth Circuit Case No. 17-17531). [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:14 am
Morrison, et al., No. 456 Mass. 463 (2010). [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 8:21 am
On May 26, 2020, a California Court of Appeals (4th District) issued its decision in Mosley et al. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 5:22 pm
Inpharmatica, Ltd. et al., No. 07-3283 (D. [read post]
24 May 2017, 7:27 am
Broadcom Limited et al, 2-16-cv-00134 (TXED May 19, 2017, Order) (Payne, MJ) [read post]
