Search for: "STATE v COUNTS" Results 7201 - 7220 of 17,257
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2013, 11:46 am by Paul E. Freehling
Now, district and appellate court judges in a single federal case pending in the Northern District of California, U.S. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 3:20 pm by LTA-Editor
Eventually, a federal prosecutor charged the two with multiple counts of enticing the victims to Florida knowing fraud would be used to induce them into sex acts, and multiple counts of administering a date rape drug. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 7:04 am
Among other issues turned aside by the Court Tuesday: a test of whether states have any authority to bar cellphone companies from listing taxes and fees as separate items on monthly bills to customers; the Eleventh Circuit found that the states do retain some of that power (Sprint Nextel v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 6:11 am by Jamison Koehler
United States, a July 2013 opinion dealing with whether or not two counts of malicious destruction of property merge. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 9:04 am by Eric Goldman
Even if Plaintiffs had so alleged, as to defendant Google (only), the Court finds that the claim in this Count is barred by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which states that “[n]o provider … of an interactive computer service shall be treated as a publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 1:44 pm by Lyle Denniston
  She was then charged by a grand jury with two counts of possessing and using a chemical weapon, and with two counts of mail theft. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 12:52 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Because I counted eleven cases which either say, state, some seem to hold or support the proposition that when it's temporary with a flood it's a trespass, and where it's permanent it's a taking ... [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 6:33 pm by Lyle Denniston
  That is a principle the Court appeared to establish in a late October 2006 decision, Purcell v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 7:20 am by Amy Howe
Lynch, the Court held that a state offense counts as an “aggravated felony” for purposes of Section 1101(a)(43) of the Immigration and Nationality Act when it has every element of a listed federal crime except one requiring a connection to interstate or foreign commerce. [read post]