Search for: "STEVENS v. THE STATE"
Results 7201 - 7220
of 7,830
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2008, 3:14 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 8:36 pm
See United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 4:37 am
Defendants believe that no more than a 4:1 or 9:1 ratio will survive judicial scrutiny based on the court's prior decison in State Farm v. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 1:14 am
Case Name: Three Sons, LLC v. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 1:14 am
Case Name: Three Sons, LLC v. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 11:02 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Steven E. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 10:57 am
Texas Penal Code §39.01(a)(2) forbids office seekers from using state equipment for campaign purposes. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 12:01 am
Texas Penal Code §39.01(a)(2) forbids office seekers from using state equipment for campaign purposes. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 9:04 am
That changed when Roe v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 6:46 pm
In Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 5:56 am
However, yesterday in New York Board of Elections v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 5:47 am
The Supreme Court's decision yesterday in New York State Board of Elections v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 5:17 pm
Thus spake Justice Stevens, concurring in yesterday's decision in New York State Bd. of Elections v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 7:03 am
The result in New York State Board of Elections v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 4:04 am
Justice Stevens dissented, joined by Justices Souter and Ginsburg. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 2:16 am
Steven Staker of the Junction City Public Defender Office won in State v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 12:15 am
The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 5:53 pm
Scalia and Thomas must find "life and breadth" as well as "penumbras" (see, Griswald v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 4:57 am
(TTABlogged here).New York State Dept. of Economic Development v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 11:40 pm
Cited Madge v. [read post]
