Search for: "State v. Childs"
Results 7201 - 7220
of 21,041
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2016, 6:53 am
Galang, supra.The Court of Appeals begins the opinion, as courts usually do, by explaining how, and why, the prosecution arose:In 2004, the female victim came to the United States from the Philippines. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 4:10 am
In Schwartz v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:09 pm
United States 15-8975 Issue: When a child protection services investigator is a government agent for purposes of the right to counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 4:25 pm
On 27 April 2015, the CPS announced the charges on its website and its blog, stating, inter alia, that the CPS had concluded there was sufficient evidence and it was in the public interest to prosecute. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:07 pm
Perfect location for a five- and eleven-year old child. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:14 am
It urged the court to reverse the 10th Circuit’s ruling and hold that states “must provide children with disabilities educational benefits that are meaningful in light of the child’s potential and the IDEA’s stated purposes. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 4:58 am
God forbid it was a child. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 4:10 am
In Koch v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 12:07 pm
[United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 7:34 am
Warby J made it clear that there was a distinction between the Defendant, as the father who had lost a child, and a journalist, whose reasons for pursuing publication would be different. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 1:03 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
In Hiller v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 8:02 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 11:04 am
In Parr v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 10:41 am
The Second Circuit says they do not have a case.The case is BC v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 8:00 am
Hotchkiss v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 8:00 am
Hotchkiss v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 6:40 am
When the civil service commission upheld his termination on grounds of insubordination, the captain did not appeal its ruling, and instead brought suit in state court asserting that his First Amendment rights had been violated. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
On August 30th, the state’s highest court overruled its prior holdings and expanded the definition of parent to grant a standing to seek custody to a domestic partner who agreed with the biological parent to the conception of a child and the raising of the child together. [read post]
