Search for: "State v. Congress"
Results 7201 - 7220
of 29,295
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2020, 7:28 am
United States, the ambitious red state lawsuit trying to tear down the entire Affordable Care Act because Congress zeroed out the tax penalty for failing to purchase qualifying insurance. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:44 am
That case was Federal Energy Administration v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Two weeks before the 1888 election, Republicans released a forged letter, allegedly from the British ambassador to the United States, stating that Cleveland was the preferred candidate of the British Empire, leading the Irish community in New York to abandon Cleveland’s campaign. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 3:53 am
First up is Nasrallah v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 9:03 pm
Indeed, just last term, in Gundy v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court currently has on its docket various cases pitting one or more states against the federal government, such as Pennsylvania v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 7:47 pm
In Chai v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 7:29 pm
United States, 520 U.S. 651, 659 (1997) (quoting Buckley v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 12:56 pm
" In Sony Corporation of America v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:30 am
Cyr, the Supreme Court addressed one of these bars, and found that because Congress had not expressly stated that the provision was intended to strip federal courts of jurisdiction to ... [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:11 am
Prigg v. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 7:10 pm
One important but less-well-known Marshall Court opinion was United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
This past summer, in Gundy v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 12:59 pm
The US Supreme Court ruled Wednesday in Holguin-Hernandez v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 10:00 am
United States and Tennessee v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 9:15 am
Banigan & Templin, et al. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am
United States, 19-5652,Smith v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 3:48 am
Investment Policy Committee v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 1:33 pm
See Ziglar v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 8:43 am
’s “original” meaning, should the interpreter look to the 1969–1972 debates in Congress, to the early and mid-1970s debates in the initial ratifying states, to the 2010s debates in the decisive ratifying states such as Virginia and Illinois, or to all of these sources together? [read post]
