Search for: "State v. Law" Results 7201 - 7220 of 155,340
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2011, 8:15 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Ryan: Whether a defendant in a state criminal case who is prohibited by state law from raising on direct appeal any claim of ineffective assistance... [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 9:59 pm
On June 21, 2007, the United States Supreme Court handed down Rita v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:45 pm by constitutional lawblogger
The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia ruled in State of West Virginia ex rel Loughry v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 10:59 am by immigrationprof
Stanford Law Review Online today published an article by Lucas Guttentag (Yale) analyzing the upcoming Supreme Court ruling in Arizona v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm by Workplace Prof
A few weeks ago, the New York Court of Appeals became the first State supreme court to expressly import Ricci v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:00 am by Paul Caron
Zelinsky (Cardozo) has posted New York Appellate Division Upholds 'Amazon' Law: Analysis, 59 State Tax Notes ___ (2011), on SSRN. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 4:20 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In his opinion in Greater Birmingham Ministries v. [read post]
The common law principles of state immunity allows foreign countries to plead state immunity, the USA could have pleaded state immunity from the outset, however in this case it failed to do so. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
The Supreme Court, granting review of three cases Monday, agreed to settle the constitutionality of a 2005 law giving federal officials authority to order the long-term confinement of individuals considered to be sexually dangerous (U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 4:41 pm
Here is the abstract: This commentary to the 2008 Missouri Law Symposium, "Return to Missouri v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 11:18 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Constitutional Law Civil rights; color of state law Even though an alderman beat a private citizen, he did not do so under color of state law, and he cannot be sued under Section 1983. [read post]