Search for: "State v. Settle"
Results 7201 - 7220
of 15,593
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2021, 7:30 am
With respect to Petitioners' claims involving the Freedom of Information Law [FOIL], the Commissioner held that such claims must dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, explaining that §89 of the Public Officers Law "vests exclusive jurisdiction over alleged FOIL violations in the Supreme Court of the State of New York. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 7:30 am
With respect to Petitioners' claims involving the Freedom of Information Law [FOIL], the Commissioner held that such claims must dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, explaining that §89 of the Public Officers Law "vests exclusive jurisdiction over alleged FOIL violations in the Supreme Court of the State of New York. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 7:30 am
With respect to Petitioners' claims involving the Freedom of Information Law [FOIL], the Commissioner held that such claims must dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, explaining that §89 of the Public Officers Law "vests exclusive jurisdiction over alleged FOIL violations in the Supreme Court of the State of New York. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
School Dist. v Arlington Teachers Assn., 78 NY2d 33, explained that "It is well settled that an arbitrator exceeds his or her power within the meaning of CPLR 7511(b)(1)(iii) where, inter alia,* the arbitration award "is irrational, or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 3:22 am
The plaintiff in Szeinbach v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 4:27 pm
Lord Abbett Municipal Income Fund Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 4:23 am
Indeed, in Quon v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
School Dist. v Arlington Teachers Assn., 78 NY2d 33, explained that "It is well settled that an arbitrator exceeds his or her power within the meaning of CPLR 7511(b)(1)(iii) where, inter alia,* the arbitration award "is irrational, or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 7:29 am
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+V&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=6200000&SeqEnd=8675000 [read post]
15 May 2013, 12:23 pm
Roman v. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 2:13 pm
Read the whole opinion, Milwaukee Police Association v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 7:53 am
The Court of International Trade has once again classified sports sandals in 6404.19.Under the 1927 ruling in a Supreme Court decision known as United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 1:18 pm
In the Viacom v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 12:52 pm
The case is Lawrence Rosen v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 3:31 pm
In a 4-2 vote in Lance v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 9:10 am
An MPEG LA press release states that "[a] team led by Axel Verhauwen of Krieger Mes & Graf v. der Groeben and Gottfried Schüll of Cohausz & Florack represented the plaintiffs. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 4:23 am
Indeed, in Quon v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 4:06 pm
Supreme Court's preemption analysis in Geier v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 10:26 am
Maryland, settles the question of whether the bulk phone-records program violates the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 11:37 am
A recent case from the United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal, Hedlund v. [read post]
