Search for: "State v. So " Results 7201 - 7220 of 116,393
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2013, 3:02 pm by Bruce Boyden
(Non-compliant notices, as the statute states, have no effect whatsoever.) [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 12:53 am
Slightly later this week, it was corrected so as to make sense. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 11:35 am by Rumpole
State, 421 So. 2d 15 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Del Rio v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 3:53 pm
Yet entirely within the province of a state court, which has the final word on the contours of state law, including but not limited to standing under state law (which may be -- and is -- different than federal standing principles).So, in the end, an interesting opinion less because of who the defendant is and more for what the Court of Appeal actually holds. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 12:22 pm
" See United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 4:43 pm
Clinton, 48 M.J. 84 (C.A.A.F. 1998), and United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Neither of the contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own citizens or subjects under the stipulations of this convention. [read post]
1 May 2008, 8:33 am
State Farm, the case has settled, so there won't be any new trial. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:46 am by Kent Scheidegger
  They didn't poll about a married man tweeting pictures of himself "in a discernibly turgid state," see Barnes v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:49 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
So the State says, fine, if you want to do that, you have to waive sovereign immunity. [read post]