Search for: "State v. South" Results 7201 - 7220 of 10,965
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The alleged sum funneled through state party committees in that case was even larger: $112 million. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 11:39 am by Stephen Bilkis
In Spoor v Spoor, Laura G v Peter G, South Carolina Dept. of Social Servs. v James C.D. and Werther v Werther, a court's obligation as "parens patriae" to protect a child on issues of child support was stringently applied. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 4:15 am
Currently,executions are stalled altogether, as states await a ruling in thelandmark Supreme Court case Baze v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 9:35 am by Ilya Shapiro
Indeed, the list of Section 5 jurisdictions is bizarre: six states of the Old Confederacy (and certain counties in three others), plus Alaska, Arizona, and counties or townships in other states ranging from New Hampshire to South Dakota. [read post]
11 Apr 2025, 6:13 am by Josh Blackman
" Section V turns to the interaction between the Ineligibility Clause and the Religious Test Clause. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:16 am by John Elwood
That is how the challengers could so effectively argue that if the Medicaid expansion did not run afoul of South Dakota v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
Across the line in South Carolina, though, the state supreme court just ruled in favor of retroactivity. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 10:37 am by PaulKostro
As the Court observed in Haynes v. [read post]