Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Heard" Results 7201 - 7220 of 7,749
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2014, 12:02 pm by Kevin Smith, J.D.
”  That is, that first appeal must be heard by an appellate panel. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:00 pm by Alan Horowitz
On January 17, the Court heard argument in United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 5:14 am
Reg. 1694 (FDA Jan. 13, 2009).When we first heard about this a couple of days ago, we thought about preparing a grand, definitive work on what the FDA did. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 7:32 am by Kevin Goldberg
The Supreme Court granted certiorari and heard oral argument on January 18, 2017. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
But, by the end of the 1800s, this rationale lost currency, and by 1917 (in Bowman v Secular Society [1917] AC 406), the House of Lords held that blasphemy protected the religious sensitivities of the individual; but the courts still confined the scope of the offence to the established Church (this was confirmed as recently as 1991 in R v Chief Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Choudhury [1991] 1 QB 429). [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 4:20 pm by Mandelman
However, I have now heard from enough people that seem to sincerely want to know the facts of the situation, and I’m happy to provide them. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm by Unknown
There are several approved self-administered biosimilars, but none actually launched; have some time before we see products where interchangeability would make a difference.Have heard from pharmacists that a different name may deter them from switching/may deter patients. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:35 am by David Kopel
In August, The Trace presented a conspiracy about the amicus briefs filed in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]