Search for: "US v. Weekes"
Results 7201 - 7220
of 39,095
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2015, 6:16 am
Weeks, supra. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:31 am
Nugent, in which the Court GVR'd to the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of last week's per curiam reversal without full briefing (also of the Fifth Circuit) in Tolan v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 6:37 am
Last week, the Court struck an unexpected blow for federalism, deciding in Wyeth v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 12:20 pm
See State v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 12:24 pm
In Rowland v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 1:54 pm
In that case, a commercial tenant could not use the premises because the elevator was not functioning for a seven week period. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 10:50 pm
The foreseeability was clear, at the very least from a week or three before the assaults, going on the Defendant’s social services reports, reports to the housing department by neighbours etc.. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 4:32 am
Yet they sued us and were allowed to do so. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 7:49 am
It would have been impossible for Respect the Look to give Expeditee “three weeks to decide whether to withdraw the supposedly offending pleading [and motion],” which is the purpose of Rule 11’s safe harbor. [read post]
3 May 2023, 4:28 pm
There have been slim pickings thus far this week in the Ninth Circuit and the California appellate courts. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 3:53 am
First up is Nasrallah v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 12:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 7:51 am
In this week’s case (Gibbs v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 1:06 pm
Using a more generous FWW version to determine the employee’s overtime pay, the employer calculated his regular rate for a given week by dividing his weekly salary by 40, rather than by the total number of hours he actually worked that week. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Earlier this week in County of Jefferson v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 7:12 am
Co-authored by Steve Shardonofsky and Rebecca DeGroff Last week, in Sirko v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 8:52 am
Last week, British Columbia Supreme Court Justice Stephen Kelleher delivered a landmark decision affirming the use of links in online speech in Canada. [read post]
6 Jul 2019, 10:43 am
Let’s Make a Deal (part of the categorical analysis . . .)Betansos v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 2:00 am
Also of interest last week was the fact that there were 16 inter partes reexamination requests and only 6 ex parte requests. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 2:31 pm
Supreme Court would soon be providing clarity with respect to the use of disparate impact under the Fair Housing Act and (by analogy) the ECOA through a decision in Magner v. [read post]
