Search for: "United States v. California" Results 7201 - 7220 of 13,840
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2014, 5:27 am by SHG
CERTIORARI DENIED… 13-1012 VANGELDER, TERRY V. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 10:27 pm by John C. Manoog III
California, the United States Supreme Court addressed the increasingly common scenario in which a person who is arrested has a cell phone in his or her possession at the time of the arrest. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 6:55 am by Tara Hofbauer
” On Tuesday, Wells highlighted opinions from the federal District of Oregon in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 5:08 am by Walter Olson
“The United States asserts that a search of all data stored on a cell phone is ‘materially indistinguishable’ from searches of [a wallet or purse] … That is like saying a ride on horseback is materially indistinguishable from a flight to the moon. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 4:24 am by SHG
In describing Posner’s challenge to the puzzle, Will Baude refers to Justice Scalia’s concurrence in California v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:15 pm by Maureen Johnston
Superior Court of California, Orange County 13-956 Issue: Whether the California Court of Appeal erred when it deepened an acknowledged circuit split and held—contrary to this Court’s decisions in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 2:43 pm by Donald Thompson
California, 2014 WL 2864483, technology is an inescapable component of our daily lives. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 12:59 pm by Michael
The California-based company was part of the Tamiz v Google Inc 2013 case in England and Wales. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 12:31 pm
The next part of Judge Posner’s discussion: I noticed a citation in the court’s opinion to a case from my court, United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 10:14 am by Ritika Singh
ABC News indicates that Secretary of State John Kerry met yesterday with foreign ministers from Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) to discuss a Middle Eastern response to the crisis in Iraq. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 5:07 am by Robin Shea
The proposed changes are intended to reflect (and expand upon) last year’s Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]