Search for: "Williams v. Williams" Results 7201 - 7220 of 19,659
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2016, 6:24 am by David Markus
  After a strenuous debate earlier in the week (Jordan v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:57 am by Dennis Crouch
 William Jay (Goodwin Proctor) is representing ePlus with Mark Perry (Gibson Dunn)  on the other side. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:19 am by Daily Record Staff
We have reworded the issue presented by Williams as follows: ... [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 8:44 pm by Sandy Levinson
  He also proudly proclaims his identity as a democratic socialist and his esteem for Eugene V. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 6:03 am
International Legal Theory: The Future of Restrictivist Scholarship on the Use of Force Jörg Kammerhofer, Introduction: The Future of Restrictivist Scholarship on the Use of Force André De Hoogh, Restrictivist Reasoning on the Ratione Personae Dimension of Armed Attacks in the Post 9/11 World Raphaël Van Steenberghe, The Law of Self-Defence and the New Argumentative Landscape on the Expansionists’ Side William C. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 8:18 pm by Patent Docs
By Andrew Williams -- Back in January 2002, when this author was near the beginning of his patent law career, the Federal Circuit handed down the In re Sang-Su Lee case. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:10 am by Eugene Volokh
Michigan banned stun guns until 2012; the repeal followed a trial court decision holding the statute unconstitutional under the Second Amendment, and People v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 9:41 am by Amanda Frost
In a recent essay, William Baude attempts to articulate a unifying theory for the Court’s sovereign-immunity jurisprudence, building on a theory first proposed by Stephen Sachs. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
The New Zealand court recognised a similar tort in C v Holland [2012] 3 NZLR 672. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 9:15 am by Guest Blogger
For the Symposium on the Constitution and Economic InequalityCynthia EstlundJoseph Fishkin and William Forbath, in their book-in-progress, have brilliantly exposed and mined a once-powerful, mostly-forgotten vein of constitutional political economic thought:  the notion that widely shared economic opportunity, and a broad middle class flanked by neither an underclass nor an oligarchic overclass, are essential foundations of our republican form of government. [read post]