Search for: ""fair use"" Results 7221 - 7240 of 10,402
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2011, 1:55 pm by Jeff Neuburger
Judge Navarro found that the use of the entire article weighed against a finding of fair use, but concluded that two of the other fair use factors weighed in favor of Klerks. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 9:36 am by StartUpAdmin
Driscoll | 2.22.2011 Businesses that are involved in digital media use music in many ways—and most require some sort of license to make the use legal. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:28 pm by Ben Sheffner
The court in the case involving Shepard Fairey's use of an AP photograph in his famous "Obama Hope" poster has ruled that a company that manufactured and distributed clothing bearing the Obama Hope image under license from one of Fairey's corporate entities did not engage in fair use. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:03 am by Jonathan Bailey
The case found that Google News violated copyright law by linking to and posting short snippets from articles out of French and German language newspapers in Belgium as, according to the court, there were no fair use provisions for such a use. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:05 am by Bruce Boyden
After noting that ideas (such as balloon dogs) are unprotected, and that fair use limits rights even further, they write: But that's the law on paper. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:51 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
  After all, each was a retelling of a classic story from the point of view of a neglected or despised character; surely if one is fair use, so should the other one be. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 5:42 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
  Fair use, or exceptions like it, is an integral part of today’s copyright law precisely because it permits and circumscribes these kinds of opportunities. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm by Kelly
SEB, S.A (Maier & Maier) US Copyright Fair use for poetry: Best practices for parody, satire, remixes, epigraphs and other uses (IP Osgoode) US Copyright – Decisions 7th Circuit: No copyright, moral rights in flower gardens under VARA: Chapman Kelly v. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 1:19 pm by C.E. Petit
... will probably be created from either (a) trying to develop a definitive, prospective definition of "fair use" that works or (b) trying to figure out what unsecured creditors are going to get out of a Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding; both are far more fiendish than The Machine. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 8:00 am by Ray Dowd
More from the Hitler Downfall Parodies Channel Purchase Copyright Litigation Handbook 2010 by Raymond J. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 4:00 am by Ray Dowd
Fedflix - how to find and download public domain videos created by the federal government video by NewCenturyHistory. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 3:10 am by Marie Louise
(Copyright Litigation Blog) Columbia law expert on telecom, copyright to FTC (IP Watch) US Copyright – Decisions District Court C D California confirms no fair use exception to digital lock provisions under the DMCA: USA v Matthew Crippen (IP Osgoode) District Court E D Texas: Another Texas judge scrutinises mass copyright litigation: Steve Hardeman LLC v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 1:34 pm
§ 1125(c)(3)(A)'s fair use doctrine discusses use for advertising for comparison to another product and criticizing a trademarked good or service. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 10:36 am by Jonathan Bailey
The topics covered in the webinar will include: Review important copyright basics What works are NOT protected by copyright Basics of fair use How to handle works by multiple authors, specifically how this affects copyright Assigning and transferring copyright; Differences between copyright licensing and transferring Copyright myths The webcast is sponsored by Digimarc and is something of a follow-up to a related webcast I gave last year on the basics of copyright. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 6:19 am by David Post
I’m sure there are some nasty privacy implications, but it looks like a pretty decent use of the technology to me.3. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:00 am by The Dear Rich Staff
That's similar to a 2003 case that ruled that a search engine’s practice of creating thumbnails was also a fair use. [read post]