Search for: "Bills v. State"
Results 7221 - 7240
of 21,859
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2017, 12:14 pm
Our amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 1:08 pm
The amendment, a response to last year’s Supreme Court decision, Citizens United v FEC, grants Congress and the states the power to “regulate the raising and spending of money and in kind equivalents” in their laws for their respective elections. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 10:22 am
The letter states (translated from Spanish): Among the entities affected by the draft bill are museums, archives, and public libraries, as more and more of them digitize their collections and make them publicly available on the Internet. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 1:22 pm
Like the court in GRK, Customs and Border Protection looked back to an old case call United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
A preview comes from Bill Mears of Fox News, with commentary from Leslie Griffin at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Greg Lipper at Bill of Health Blog and Doug Laycock in The Washington Post. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:48 am
First up is Thacker v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 4:30 am
At Techdirt, Tim Cushing looks at this week’s argument in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 4:05 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 5:06 am
Holmgren v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 3:16 pm
In Apeldyn Corp. v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am
The justices also sent United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 1:48 am
OR STATE GOVERNMENT WORKS [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:37 am
It brings to mind the comment of Lord Scott in Rusbridger v Attorney-General, a case about the moribund Section 3 of the Treason Felony Act 1848:“[Y]ou do not have to be a very good lawyer to know that to advocate the abolition of the monarchy and its replacement by a republic by peaceful and constitutional means will lead neither to prosecution nor to conviction. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am
"Prosecutors later initiated the civil forfeiture action of United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 4:02 am
INS v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:47 am
Supreme Court ruling, in the landmark case of Massachusetts v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 10:54 am
Cal. 1998); and a cf to Foray v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:10 am
No other right included in the Bill of Rights is left to the mercy of the state in this way. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:32 am
First, SB 672 ratifies “adequate consideration,” as articulated in Fifield v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 7:20 am
In Davenport v. [read post]
