Search for: "Bounds v. State"
Results 7221 - 7240
of 9,710
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm
Business should thus look to the exceptions under Art. 49 GDPR or, as a risk mitigating measure, contractually commit to unilaterally be bound by the SCCs. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 2:09 pm
They are bound by the federal Constitution no less than other state officials are. [read post]
5 May 2021, 5:02 am
" In Rasoulzadeh v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 7:47 pm
Conventional law tends to be static and substantially bound by the territory form which it emerges and in which it applies with the greatest force. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:34 am
State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 10:31 am
In a 2010 case, WaveDivision Holdings v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 4:05 am
These miserly limitations on compensation for negligence by state and local entities have rightly received a torrent of criticism lately following the Indiana State Fair stage collapse. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:20 pm
The government is bound to produce all of the statements made by the accused in its possession, as the statements of a detainee-defendant defending against capital charges are almost always relevant to his defense. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 11:42 am
United States. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 3:55 am
In Cupcake v Boomboom (covered here), the plaintiff looked to an operating agreement identifying the members, while defendant relied upon a submission to the State Liquor Authority identifying different members. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 11:11 am
In State of Punjab v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 8:32 am
(Winter v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:59 am
As the Supreme Court explained in Baker v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 5:21 am
At the same time it is a reminder that constitutional systems, however incompatible, share a core characteristic--the institution of legitimacy framing principles and rules, of conceptual and policy taboos--that mark the difference between systems for the unimpeded exercise of discretion, from those that are bounded (strictly at least in theory) by the normative and rule constraints that reflect their fundamental character (discussed in From Constitution to Constitutionalism). [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court handed down its decision in June Medical Services v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:37 pm
A weakness in the case law was the judges’ reluctance to be bound by the European Convention of Human Rights. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 12:09 am
In the case G v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
From Doe 1 v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 4:51 am
As the Hulk v. [read post]
