Search for: "COOPER V. COOPER" Results 7221 - 7240 of 11,626
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2012, 4:44 pm by admin
Indeed, the exchange of information between companies or association members can have many pro-competitive purposes and effects – for example, facilitating research or production initiatives that would be impossible without cooperation, increasing market transparency and consumer knowledge, leading to enhanced products and services or supporting lobbying and industry advocacy efforts. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 9:35 am by Darren
  For instance, the buyers at the wine cooperatives that the First Respondent sells its grapes to may well consider the grapes to originate from the producer of the wine. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 10:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
””3) Patently-O: Judge Posner: No Damages Despite Infringement – This post reports on Judge Posner’s Order in Apple v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 2:52 pm
56/11 Raiffeisen Waren-Zentrale Rhein-Main eG v Saatgut-Treuhandverwaltungs GmbH. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 2:49 pm
56/11 Raiffeisen Waren-Zentrale Rhein-Main eG v Saatgut-Treuhandverwaltungs GmbH. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:12 pm
In this case courts will usually undertake an “economic realities” test, which considers five factors articulated in the Supreme Court’s 1947 decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 3:24 am
Germany Claudia Schubert, Whistle-Blowing after Heinisch v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court's decision in Morrison v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court's decision in Morrison v. [read post]