Search for: "Case v. Case" Results 7221 - 7240 of 291,979
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2013, 9:01 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
KaplinskyAs we previously reported, settlement discussions are underway in Township of Mount Holly v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 10:00 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
With exquisite timing, the Court of Appeals lays it out for us.The case is United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 1:07 am by CMS
There have been no findings of facts in this case, this section is included for contextual background. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 11:32 am
  Principles are established, rules are in place, and everyone understands that a case will be decided based upon those principles.Then along came Roe v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 1:37 am by sally
Vicoplus SC PUH v v Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid; BAM Vermeer Contracting sp. zoo v Same; Olbek Industrial Services sp. zoo v Same (Case C-307/09 to C-309/09); [2011] WLR (D) 46 “Articles 56FEU and 57FEU of the FEU Treaty did not preclude a member state from making the hiring out on its territory of workers who were Polish nationals subject to the obtaining of a work permit during the transitional period provided for in paragraph 2… [read post]
19 Nov 2024, 3:49 am by Charles Sartain
In legal parlance, it was a “remand”, but the result in Energy Transfer, LP et al v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:20 am by Brian Wolfman
An important pending case for consumers is First American Financial Corp. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 3:53 pm by Zachary Spilman
The cases, all convictions in accordance with the pleas of the accused, and all unpublished decisions are: United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 1:45 pm by Kevin M. Mazza, Esq.
., wrote a blog post discussing the recent Appellate Division case of Ricci v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 8:15 am by MARY EVENDEN, MATRIX
The Court of Appeal agreed with the judge’s analysis and held that the case of Re V [2004] EWCA Civ 54 was clear authority for the Court of Protection having jurisdiction to consider a human rights claim, noting the need for a s 7 claim to be clearly identified and pleaded. [read post]