Search for: "Does, A-H"
Results 7221 - 7240
of 16,615
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2024, 12:29 pm
H-23-2961 (S.D. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 4:10 pm
If the result of the enquiry does not allay suspicion, the matter must then be reported to the judge. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 12:30 pm
§ 3161(h)(1)(F). [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 2:24 pm
How does one cure that type of breach? [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 6:10 am
Given that it does not account for users who shift their Internet usage to VPNs, the reliability of the data is questionable. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
H), thereby beginning the running of the six-year statute of limitations anew (see General Obligations Law § 17-101; Lew Morris Demolition Co. v Board of Educ. of City of NY, 40 NY2d 516, 520-521 [1976]). [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 10:09 am
See Pamela H. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:26 am
The Tribune does a better job, calling the hostility between Chief Judge James Holderman and United States Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald "extraordinary", though even that fails to capture the situation. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 11:44 am
And so he does again in his latest Sidebar Column on the most important case of the decade, District of Columbia v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
Carey was found to be in contempt notwithstanding the Court of Appeal’s findings that “[h]e did not desire or knowingly choose to disobey the order”. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 12:52 pm
Typically this does not happen quickly. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 6:24 pm
As this was only one of the deficiencies the court found in the NLRA's explanation, it may not have been determinative, but it does seem to represent an erroneous and unduly strict application of Fox, one more in line with Justice Breyer's dissent than Justice Scalia's opinion for the Court. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 7:10 pm
Does facilitating the use of contraception that might conceivably prevent implantation, even if that risk is very low, contravene some religious precept? [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 12:39 pm
DHS has shown that there is a strong likelihood that its decision to consider the receipt of in-kind government assistance as part of its totality-of-the-circumstances test is a reasonable interpretation of the INA and does not violate the Rehabilitation Act. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 9:51 am
” Assuming the Supreme Court does take up an abortion case next term — and is urged to reconsider Casey and Roe by some of the parties — how many justices will be willing to take this step? [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:22 am
This is a blatant effort at deterring public participation by anyone who does not hew 100% to the most radical version of the gay rights movement. [read post]
6 May 2023, 10:31 am
The authors of the report are essentially trying to argue that because MOHELA revenues are higher than they used to be, it does not matter that, without loan cancellation, they would be higher still. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 5:07 am
This framing may not be enough to justify standing, but it does articulate a coherent theory of when judicial enforcement of legislative prerogative would be justified. [read post]
3 May 2019, 5:58 am
Professor McConnell concludes: What does this history tell us? [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 5:51 pm
Although this is not constitutionally required, I have long believed such a standard is implied because the Constitution does not distinguish between judicial nominations and other presidential nominations. [read post]
