Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 7221 - 7240
of 7,360
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2007, 12:34 pm
Essentially Craig v. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 10:31 pm
A good example is Sayers and others v Smithkline Beecham plc and others, an England and Wales Queen's Bench Division last Wednesday from Mr Justice Keith, picked up by LexisNexis Butterworths' All England digests.The United States Department of Health and Human Services was involved in US proceedings in which it was alleged that the MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) and MR (measles, rubella) vaccinations in young children helped cause autism. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 4:01 pm
This case, too, has avoided attention among English speakers. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 9:28 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has issued its eagerly awaited ruling in Ehrenfeld v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 10:22 am
OR STATE GOVERNMENT WORKS [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 1:55 am
What constitutes patentable second medical use is occasionally a subject of dispute, a neat example being Actavis UK Ltd v Merck & Co Inc [2007] EWHC 1311 (Ch), an English Patents Court decision from Mr Justice Warren yesterday, available here on BAILII. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 10:34 am
The trial court's decision dismissing Thompson's complaint for failure to state a claim is, therefore, affirmed.In Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 3:48 pm
This is like the Times's reporting on Cohen v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 11:45 am
He learned English and is active in his church and in his community. [read post]
29 May 2007, 6:18 am
The Secretariat then presents the request to the Assemblies of the Member States for approval. [read post]
27 May 2007, 6:47 pm
See Miller v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:52 am
However he regrets that UK legislation should be drafted in terms so convoluted and opaque as to require even major points of policy to be teased out of the statutory thicket rather than stating them openly and concisely upfront. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
"Well, state court judges are savvy and powerful people. [read post]
23 May 2007, 10:42 pm
Charman v Charman, [2007] EWCA Civ 503. [read post]
23 May 2007, 1:02 am
New Jersey and Blakely v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 9:09 am
In plain English, you gotta pick your spots. [read post]
15 May 2007, 6:22 am
State v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:34 pm
Stephenson v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 9:55 am
Prakash stressed that even legal immigrants were forced to work 6 or 7 days a week without overtime pay, breaks or medical insurance because they did not speak English or know how to seek resources. [read post]
8 May 2007, 4:43 am
There, the CAFC ruled that "it is improbable that the average American purchaser would translate VEUVE into the English word "widow. [read post]
