Search for: "HOPE v. STATE"
Results 7221 - 7240
of 16,492
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2015, 5:55 pm
On Friday, in Arpaio v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 5:27 pm
This type of counsel is known in California as Cumis counsel, by reference to the 1984 California intermediate appellate case of San Diego Federal Credit Union v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 1:21 am
Similarly, in State of Karnataka v. [read post]
15 Aug 2015, 5:49 am
These relationships are not restricted to the government, but yes to the whole society, through a set of essential practices for the maintenance of the state. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:30 pm
I just hope the trend continues its acceleration, as these are literally questions of life and death. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 12:45 pm
Within hours of the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 10:56 am
In Shah v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 5:42 am
For an interesting recent case dealing with this question, see AFDI v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 4:10 am
In Marie v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 11:46 am
I hope that's what's troubling him. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 11:16 am
See FDA v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 9:22 am
Although there is as yet no sign of active defiance by officials in states where such marriages remained banned — that is, as of June 26, when the Court decided Obergefell v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 9:14 am
Barko v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 8:48 pm
The United Kingdom currently permits whole life sentences but after the European Court of Human Rights judgment in Vinter v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 3:49 pm
DOJ sent out a notice earlier today involving yet another ISIL-related material support case, this one involving a California man who had hoped to get to Syria in order to join ISIL (United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 10:34 am
Case citation: Granite State Trade School, LLC v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 6:03 pm
” The appellate court added that “other courts interpreting identical insured v. insured exclusions have reached the same conclusion. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
This is what Roland has to say:In June, CJEU Advocate General Wathelet issued his opinion in Nestlé v Cadbury (Case C-215/14 [noted by the IPKat here].The perceived wisdom has since been that Nestlé's Kit Kat shape (left) must necessarily be unregistrable as a trade mark. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:41 am
Madison (1803) to Obergefell v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 2:54 pm
” [1] Gregware v. [read post]
