Search for: "IN RE B E S" Results 7221 - 7240 of 7,830
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2008, 12:20 pm
Let’s say you’re head of HR for a prominent fast food restaurant chain. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 4:21 pm
The Sixth Circuit "will not deem final a district court's decision remanding to a bankruptcy court for further proceedings if the district court has not certified the decision pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b). [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 12:20 pm
The Sixth Circuit "will not deem final a district court's decision remanding to a bankruptcy court for further proceedings if the district court has not certified the decision pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b). [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 8:05 pm
  Here's an overhead shot of the factory, courtesy of Google Maps: In February of 2001, Amide and Bertek (a distributor of Digitek and the source of the "B" stamped on Digitek tablets) wrote to the FDA urging it to eliminate the 1974 Digitek regulations. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 3:08 pm
We just received this e-mail from a regular visitor to the blog. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 12:28 pm
Here's what it says:A person commits criminal impersonation if he knowingly assumes a false or fictitious identity or capacity, and in such identity or capacity he:(a) Marries, or pretends to marry. . . or(b) Becomes bail or surety for a party in an action . . ., civil or criminal . . . ; (c) Confesses a judgment . . . ; or(d) Does an act which if done by the person falsely impersonated, might subject such person to . ., civil or criminal . . . liability . . . ; or(e)… [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 8:02 am
CiteID=453653Docket Number: S-07-0029Appeal from the District Court of Carbon County, Honorable Norman E. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 7:11 am
Dans la première catégorie nous trouvons, par exemple, les ressortissants français et suisses qui bénéficient d'un séjour de 90 jours. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 6:54 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
” The likely first step would be to try to force the latter party to cease utilizing the mark, and to try to recoup damages for their use of an arguably confusing mark (the same words simply re-arranged). [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 9:56 pm
If you think this is a franchise they're milking, all I would say is give them a moment's credit for inventing the franchise--after which I agree with you utterly. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]