Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges"
Results 7221 - 7240
of 9,823
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2011, 7:13 am
We’re engineers, not theoretical physicists. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 3:15 am
We’re going to do it with a lot of laterals, like The Play. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 8:34 am
The inspector had this in mind; he thought that a relatively minor re-design of the layout of the turbines might remove most, if not all, of the impacts on the peat deposits; however, this was not the application before him. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 7:29 pm
It is at least theoretically possible that Gaddafi would re-entrench in order to fight to the end as a result of the ICC warrant against him. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 3:31 pm
Although some are taking a jesting attitude toward the new construction, like one judge who was quoted in the Columbus Dispatch as saying ""if you wear dresses, you're on notice that you might want to take the elevator, as I will be doing," many have been offended by the apparent thoughtlessness that went into the planning and construction of the stairs. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:42 pm
Moreover, this filing date would extend back to any foreign priority date, effectively overruling In re Hilmer.[5] As in current practice under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:04 am
Judging by the history, it’s not quite an edit war, but it moves a lot more quickly than the typical SEC filing. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 10:48 pm
[H]is obloquy sullied the public's perception of the profession.Even though the public wasn't there, didn't hear, didn't know.Hmmm.This isn't the Mark Gardner Rule which prohibits saying bad things about judges because they are always false even if they're true. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 12:54 pm
However, if you’re presented with a similar list of questions that are not designated as optional or voluntary, you may need to answer and return them promptly or you could face a contempt of court citation. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 12:54 pm
However, if you’re presented with a similar list of questions that are not designated as optional or voluntary, you may need to answer and return them promptly or you could face a contempt of court citation. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 6:00 am
He particularly cautioned against increased judicial review of agency rulemaking because a judge’s “skill set is not well-designed to deal with economic complexity and there’s a risk that judicial review would get courts into areas which Congress and the executive branch are much better suited to. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
” The concurring judge joined the opinion of the majority judges, but wroteseparately to emphasize that Congress may wish to reexamine the applicability of the original defendant rule in CAFA Act context. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:04 am
On January 8, 2009, President-Elect Obama publicly designated Johnson to be the nominee for General Counsel of the Defense Department. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 10:43 am
But now we're jumping the gun. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 6:27 am
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm
Jurado (Property, intangible) Test your TTAB Judge-Ability: Is MOTIONPOWER merely descriptive of electrical generation? [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 9:57 pm
Much as the most rabid of the TeaPartiers may bitch and moan about how bad things are, we're not close. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 9:01 pm
” I see no compelling reason to re-invent the wheel and re-write posts from years gone by about why the day is so important to the jury system. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:21 pm
He wrote one of the first home computer guides — the ominously titled Without Me You’re Nothing. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:09 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubrmani, with comments from Eric] In re Google Inc. [read post]
