Search for: "Little v State" Results 7221 - 7240 of 26,856
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2008, 12:55 pm
Gravante, the attorney who represented Frank Esposito in People v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
The floor goes to Katfriend Tove Graulund.* Lego 3D manikin mark valid, says General CourtJeremy reports on Case T‑395/14 Best-Lock (Europe) Ltd v OHIM, Lego Juris A/S, a General Court of the European Union decision regarding the validity of a Lego Community trade mark that will be familiar to many readers who are children, have children or are movie buffs: the three-dimensional shape of a little Lego man.* Swiss cheese, Innocence and a question of guilt:… [read post]
13 May 2009, 3:03 am
The most important opinion generated during the case is here: United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 5:25 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
To view a copy of the Court of Appeals's decision, please use this link: Hoffman v. [read post]
16 May 2020, 10:22 am by Lee E. Berlik
In today’s blog post, I’m going to tell you about a fun little motion we call a “motion craving oyer. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 7:53 am by Sarah Cleveland
  And contrary to some commentators, the 1790 criminal piracy statute at issue in United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am by INFORRM
Amid the extraordinary political turmoil of the past week, the House of Commons held a little noticed short debate on the subject of “Lawfare and Investigative Journalism“. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 5:26 am
Because I find that SunPower's complaint fails to state a claim under CFAA, its only federal cause of action, I will not address the state law claims. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:48 am by Orin Kerr
I’m also not sure it makes sense to apply the Franks v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 10:31 am by Daniel Deacon
The descriptive account also suggests that the Supreme Court’s decision in Oil States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 5:59 pm
New York State Penal Law Section 170.25, Criminal Possession of a Forged Instrument in the Second Degree, establishes that if a person possesses a forged instrument, with knowledge it is forged and with intent to defraud, deceive, or injure another, that person may be guilty of this crime if he or she possesses a forged instrument of a kind specified in New York State Penal Law Section 170.10, Forgery in the Second Degree. [read post]