Search for: "Lively v. State"
Results 7221 - 7240
of 29,024
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2012, 2:13 pm
Fast forward to 2012, where the Missouri Supreme Court found otherwise in State v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 12:48 pm
To deport him to Mexico would surely radically disrupt his life, as well as the lives of his family.But he has a conviction for domestic violence, to which he pled no contest in 2017. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 1:15 pm
Brackeen v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 1:22 pm
See Graham v. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 7:27 am
Hodges, 576 U.S. 644, 675–76 (2015), which held that any state’s restriction on same-sex marriage was void ab initio. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 5:24 am
Willow Tower’s response was that her evidence on the issue of veganism was “woeful” – there was no evidence to support her contention that she lived her life in accordance with ethical vegan principles [48]. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 3:54 pm
The Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 4:09 pm
Heller , like Bush v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 7:25 am
Mr and Mrs Brake lived on a farm which they ran as a wedding and events venue in partnership with a third party. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 1:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 8:23 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 6:37 am
For many years she had been living off $766 a month in Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) benefits plus another $350 in EBT benefits (food stamps). [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 11:37 am
But you cannot sue them simply because you live in the state and you have been hurt. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 5:14 pm
Furthermore, the case shows how the Court approaches the balancing of Articles 8 and 10 when the private lives of those involved in politics is at stake. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 12:01 am
The Court, in the opinion Boynton v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:41 am
In State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 8:18 pm
He then argues that principles of federalism would also have discouraged such a result, since they required the court to defer to the stated legislative purpose of the state that had passed the law. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 5:32 am
Non-citizens living in the United States are certainly not held in slavery, but Taney's infamous phrase is still eerily apt: Because of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, the U.S. government can snatch any non-citizen living in the United States at any time, anywhere, and hold them indefinitely without the right of habeas corpus and without any of the criminal procedure protections afforded by the Bill of Rights. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 7:16 pm
The decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 2:25 pm
Curtis Bradley and Jack Goldsmith examined the legal efficacy of the U.S. government prosecuting entities owned by foreign states, in the context of Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. [read post]
