Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 7221 - 7240 of 19,798
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2021, 10:57 am by John Holtz
(b) This notice shall be marked on any reproduction of these data, in whole or in part. [read post]
18 May 2023, 10:41 am by Neil H. Buchanan
Buchanan The debt ceiling crisis is no laughing matter. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
H/T to Antonin Pribetic for a pointer to the case of the day, Lantheus Med. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 8:21 am
This week the Appellate Division, First Department (In re Develop Don't Destroy (Brooklyn) v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 6:36 pm
Thus, the defendant is left without his constitutional right to the assistance of an expert to defend against the charges.These issues have yet to be litigated at the federal level, but I'm sure it is only a matter of time. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 6:31 am by Kluwer UPC News blogger
‘While not having any knowledge or expertise in this matter, I do not believe that it represents necessarily a “setback”. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 5:35 am
Recently, the Fourth Department had to decide whether and to what extent the right against self-incrimination exists in such proceedings in Matter of Heckl, 2007 NY Slip Op 06089. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 2:27 pm by admin
I know you’ve all heard a lot about that so I won’t dwell on it here – for more general information about the new law see: here. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
H/T to Antonin Pribetic for a pointer to the case of the day, Lantheus Med. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
H/T to Antonin Pribetic for a pointer to the case of the day, Lantheus Med. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm by familoo
I revisited the case of Re H (Children) [2012] EWCA Civ 1797 recently, having read a blog post about it on Suesspicious Minds entitled Oh Lord, won’t you buy me, a McKenzie Friend? [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:34 am by Russell Jackson
  Yes, the claim was preempted, but the disposition should have been a dismissal on the merits under Rule 12(b)(6), rather than a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction. [read post]