Search for: "MAY v. US "
Results 7221 - 7240
of 120,415
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2024, 1:34 pm
” [A reminder that court-ordered identity and age verification requirements likely violate the First Amendment; the other claims may do so as well.] [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 10:08 am
In FTC v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 2:00 am
The first 10 days of EFMLEA leave may be unpaid unless the employee elects to use accrued vacation, personal, or medical or sick leave. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 4:04 am
R. and H. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 11:06 am
The post Army v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 7:07 am
[In an opinion respecting the denial of certiorari, Justice Thomas suggests it may be time to reconsider Gonzales v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 12:09 pm
The Compassionate Use Act was a statute passed by initiative. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
The basis of the order requiring Facebook to identify TVO was the decision of the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); but it “is a power which for good reasons must be sparingly used” (Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497, 503 (Finlay CJ). [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 5:17 pm
Town Code § 198–104 provides that “a nonconforming use may be changed to … any use which the ZBA shall find to be less intensive and more in character with the uses permitted in the district in which the nonconforming use is located. [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:26 am
IPT decided that such activities had been a lawful use of its powers pursuant to s.5 of the Intelligence Services Act 1994. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:41 am
Time Warner Cable, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 6:31 am
T.A.B. v. [read post]
Leiba v. Holder: Aggravated felony bar in INA 212(h) inapplicable to those who were never “admitted”
3 Dec 2012, 6:01 am
You should consult with a qualified immigration attorney to see if you may benefit from the holding of Leiba v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 6:52 am
Using race or Latino ancestry as a factor in making law enforcement decisions with respect to whether any Latino occupant of a vehicle in Maricopa County may be in the country without authorization. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 4:55 am
Miller v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is AFL Telecommunications, LLC v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 12:36 pm
Waxman began his argument by explaining that Miles v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 12:36 pm
Waxman began his argument by explaining that Miles v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 8:16 pm
In the case of Carr v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:12 pm
A use provision describes an article by its principal or actual use. [read post]
