Search for: "P. T.2" Results 7221 - 7240 of 14,921
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2010, 3:57 pm by B.W. Barnett
.#3        R-E-S-P-E-C-T#2        No Personal Favors#1        Don’t Lie#3        R-E-S-P-E-C-TRule #3 is one that cannot be overlooked. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" (I'm quoting here a North Dakota statute enacted recently.) [2.] [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Yes, but most litigants can’t afford that. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 2:56 pm by Unknown
   On April 1st, the Colorado Supreme Court issued its order on this question, holding that:[T]he General Assembly reasonably resolved the ambiguity in article V, section 7 through its unanimous adoption of Joint Rules 23(d) and 44(g), which together operate to count the 120 calendar days of a regular session consecutively except during a declared public health emergency disaster, in which case only days on which at least one chamber convenes count toward the 120-day maximum. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 8:10 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
 This is despite the SEC’s general agreement that “[p]ersonal social media sites of individuals employed by a public company would not ordinarily be assumed to be channels through which the company would disclose material corporate information. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 9:58 am
State of Indiana is an 18-page, 2-1 opinion, with the dissent beginning on p. 18. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 2:11 pm
State Bar of California, 58 Cal.4th at p. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
[T]he original elements in the plot of a play or novel may be a substantial part, so that copyright may be infringed by a work which does not reproduce a single sentence of the original. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 1:32 am by JR Chaves
Hasta el 20 de junio de 2021 inclusive, constituido el juzgado o tribunal en su sede, los actos de juicio, comparecencias, declaraciones y vistas y, en general, todos los actos procesales , se realizarán preferentemente mediante presencia telemática, siempre que los juzgados, tribunales y fiscalías tengan a su disposición los medios técnicos necesarios para ello. 2. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 7:27 am by Marty Lederman
  Colorado isn't purporting to "enforce" Section 3, and states don't have any power to enforce its disqualification directive with respect to federal officers. [read post]