Search for: "PAGE v. UNITED STATES"
Results 7221 - 7240
of 9,966
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2011, 3:41 am
CHRISTOPHER SUGRUE, et al.,07 MDL 1902 (JSR)Applies To:08 Civ. 3065, 08 Civ. 3086; UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK; 2011 U.S. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:22 pm
I have recently dealt in detail with the position under the English law in comparison to the stronger protections in the United States. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 12:12 pm
Ed Whelan has a page of resources on Ninth Circuit nominee Goodwin Liu. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 10:29 am
In Beauperthuy v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc.pdf., the United States District Court for the Northern District of California considered the overtime claims of both hourly and salaried employees at a large fitness chain. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 7:16 am
In the United States, the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:31 am
I have recently dealt in detail with the position under the English law in comparison to the stronger protections in the United States. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/02/28/08-56349.pdf United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 9:01 pm
See Fayed v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:22 am
Cooper (2011 ONCA 150) the Court of Appeal for Ontario held that the Ontario courts had jurisdiction to try a defamation claim brought by an Ontario based academic against the “Slavic Review”, an academic journal published in the United States, of which 81 copies were distributed in Ontario. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
Property used predominantly outside the United States does not qualify for a Section 1603 grant. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 9:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 7:10 am
See United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 7:04 am
The case of the day, Baldiga v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:06 pm
In Binder, the United States District Court for the Central District of California (the “Court”) focused on whether Plaintiffs had ownership of the trademarks and whether Defendants' use of the trademark through Google’s AdWords program was "likely to cause confusion. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:26 pm
I have no intention of discussing how the United States Supreme Court eviscerated the confrontation clause or even getting to the substance of the opinion itself. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 12:50 pm
" Dow Agrosciences L.L.C. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 1:55 am
The BPP guidelines, published online by the United States Bankruptcy Court, clearly state: The bankruptcy petition preparer is not an attorney and is not authorized to practice law. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 11:30 am
Image via WikipediaActress Katie Holmes, 32, whose five-year marriage to actor Tom Cruise--Hollywood's most famous Scientologist--has been fodder for supermarket tabloids, has filed a $50 million defamation suit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against Star Magazine's parent company, American Media, Inc., whose stable of publications also includes The National Inquirer.The nine-page Complaint, Katie Holmes v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:00 am
Universal Citation, an excellent page at Third Amendment.com, states that it was originally a class project on the future of online legal publishing at Harvard in a class on the Future of Business and the Internet in 1997. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 9:57 am
On March 1, 2011, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling in Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
