Search for: "People v Favors"
Results 7221 - 7240
of 11,774
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2008, 10:38 am
I'm skeptical that there's any real policy in favor of anonymity here. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 8:19 am
At trial, plaintiff argued the Hispanic managers gave favorable treatment to Hispanic workers, which also included better schedules. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 4:35 am
Yvon v City of Oceanside, 2016 WL 4238539 (SD CA 8/11/16)Filed under: first amendment [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:03 am
For example, in Barbee v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 2:03 pm
Over the past few weeks, several people have asked me whether an employer can, or should, require job applicants or employees to disclose their usernames and passwords for sites such as Facebook, Twitter, etc. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 8:19 am
After a trial, the judge ruled in favor of defendant. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 3:00 am
James Kakos, etc., et al. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 6:38 pm
Specifically, in People v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 5:42 am
The Bill is in response to the 2018 ruling of the Supreme Court of Texas in ConocoPhillips Company et al v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:34 am
Duffy was co-counsel in the important Supreme Court case KSR v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 7:24 pm
Sheppard v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 12:47 pm
The court must find that no reasonable cause exists to believe that you committed the offense for which the arrest was made, (see People v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:14 am
In Branch v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 10:54 am
But the judge, who found that DOJ violated its obligation to turn over favorable material, did not throw out the case. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 12:54 pm
On appeal, the issue was whether California should reconsider a state Supreme Court case, Borer v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 5:00 pm
The film debuted at the Sundance festival earlier this year and has garnered favorable reviews. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 6:28 am
The Texas Supreme Court recently ruled, 5 to 4, in favor of the royalty owners in that case. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 11:44 am
Well, their courts invalidated the sodomy law years prior to Lawrence v. [read post]
Senate Republicans introduce companion bill barring NLRB from issuing decisions with “quorum of one”
1 May 2013, 4:06 am
Circuit ruled in Noel Canning v NLRB that the recess appointments of two members to the NLRB were unconstitutional, meaning only one of the current sitting Board members has been confirmed by the Senate. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 3:30 am
Calypso Technology, Inc. v. [read post]
